To understand why Mr Trump's 1461 day presidency to end of 2020 was likely to be the most dangerous whomever ruled the wavelengths, BRI.school invites you to co-edit a 7 minute read on a short history of world trade in millennium 2 - see far right column. In Moore's laws maths -this period's exponential rise breaches singularity - for first one computer chip has more switching/analytic capacity than the human brain's cells- tenmoore.com - The Games

  1. 2 hours ago

    trump's 1461 days were natures, AI, SDG destiny's and most dangerous presidency this month's 3 greatest risks to under 30s goodwill webs and english-language edu- brexit, n korea and huawei (see keynesian analysis in next tweet)

INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4 : special china thanks: BRI Belt Road IQ -need custom guide rsvp chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk normanmacrae foundation, DC-text 240 316 8157
Main reason for optimism is leapfrogging - thats when a society/place that was excluded from industrial age networks leapfrogs an old system to a new one thanks to 1000 times more COMstech than 1946; about a third of the world never had wired telephone lines, now almost all have mobile (text version); more than a quarter of the world never had electricity grids, now microsolar is linking in;. Prior to 2017 only Jim Kim open spaced this debated in DC: let's hope all parents and youth do now from usa to china to Rome, from Scotland to Argentina, from Bangalore to Haiti. from . G1 G2. Join Valuetrue.com and QBG -does your place have a JYK to celebrate global youth? futures of Liberty 1 & education 1
1:08 #2030now 3.19
0:39 0.31 1:40 1:02 1.21...joy jk search 1........ co		 Which is your top 100 jim kim video vote for end-poverty tedx wcg..Jim Kim2030nowjimkim2transcripts.doc2030nowjimkim.doc, where world demands women manage poverty why not development?
http://www.tedxwbg.com/ Sources for millennials Happy 2015 dialogues of pih on 1 Ebola 2 how to leverage technology to radically engage patients on health care; UN is 2015 year of all change to sustainability goals... support economistmooc.blogspot.com
Even as the 1960s moon race inspired the world, we need to understand how unequal the opporttunity to innovate had been - even in the 1960s as many as half the world's people had no access to electricity grids so they got their news of the moon race by word of mouth.

Consider 1000-1500- until the last few years of this period , the known world was Europe-Asia and NE Africa; #BR8 the med sea was the main world trade waterway; places facing this sea increasingly developed win-win trades; moreover #BR7 the west asian border to med sea was the start of an amazing overland relay of traders which stretched all the way to china (the silk road was the greatest overland world trade route ever and to sustain its interfacing markets required positive cross-cultural bridging all along its route. Silks and spices from the Chinese end acted like a positive currency- there was much demand for them whose value naturally went up the further they were merchanted back to Europe. Everyone gained for this trading route- you can read marco polo's diaries- perhaps nowhere invested more in artistic celebrations of being a major hub of positive trade than his hometown venice in europe and the town he was asked to govern for 2 years in china Hangzhou which marco described as the great town of markets in the world.)

What happened towards 1500 that 2 long shipping routes were discovered by north europeans- the new world of the ameriucas to the west (#BR6 N, #BR10 what we now call Latin America), and a way of reaching the @BR2 South Asian coastal Belt (starting with the indian subcontinent) by sailing around africa. A ship captain couldnt affird such a long return voyage unless he goit what trade he wanted- soon this big ships were equipped with gun power and crews were pressganged or even enslaved. Next in the process was colonising. So it was that nations became big by pludering economies of other peoples places. Back in 1500 places economic size was corelated with population. Soon Britain grew at the expense particularly of the Indian subcontiuent. Mainly Britain and France colonised Africa too, Spain andPotrtugal colonised Latin America. North America was settled by a mixyure of Europeans whose declaration of Indendence in 1776 ended any attempt by Britain to colonise America, But we should note that the USA was built on a sort of internal colonisation - natives had theor places taken over and slaves were used to do most of the hard labour. In effect the old war's colonial ways casued the 2 world wars of the fkirst half of the 20th C. From 1946 most of the world's countries regained their independence but starting from (mainly undeveloped states - poverty that the colonia era had gtraped them in).

Ironically whule the UDA came to tghe resuce of the old workld and from 1946 helped relaunch the two biggest losers of world war 2 Germsny and Japan, american (not withstandiong thair family trees origins) had previously had little modern of knowledge of Eurasia but were pulled into peacekeeping and the cold war with russia through the sceond half of the 20th C. Whilst there was some understanding of the extraoerdinary progress japanese enginers made with electornics, civil and other enginnering, the rise and rise of the east and the often difficult bodrers that had been caused by British and Jpoanese colonisation of the region are not deeply studied by most Americans or their media. It should be the best news the world has ever seen that the fifth of the world in chjna tghat closed itself to the world for more than a centiry after Brfits has offered opium as a gtrading currency in 1860 is now as entrepreneurial as anywhere. With over half of tghe world's ;people facikng either the sout asia or east asia coastal belts, the opportunity the east is cfreating to win0pwin gtrade oin line with moore's ever increasing technology should make sustainable youth worlwdie the gfreatesty positive curency-invetsment the human race has ever mapped. But this is not how USA or the block of coungtriues ruled by the Euro have marketed transapfrently. Instead we are caught in the Keynsian crisis of economist not valuing the hippocratic oathes he had published as tghe final chapter of the ngeneral throy of employment money and interest. The 2020s are likely to make the system designs our tech spreads irreversible- will the end game be big brother extinction or little sister sustainability?

Monday, April 3, 2017

my father was keysnian deputy editor of The Economist for half of his 40 years there 1948-1988- by Keynsian he would analyse any market's or hemisphere's long term leadership story around 2 system goals

1 end poverty - particularly the fact that under industrial revolution 1 (steam engine) the opportunity to live very unevenly distributed -eg in 1960s one segment of humanity racing to moon probably third still not on electricity grids

2 places should value developing next generations' livelihoods however much the future's most trusted entrepreneurship was likely to be exponentially different from history

in 1972 my first job was for the uk's national development project for computer assisted learning - over the next 12 years mainly dad but partly I wrote up entrepreneurial revolution - what would 3 billion new jobs look like if by mid 2010s human race was spending 1000 time more on communications technologies than 1946 -our field book was called 2025 report - a concise future history of education and economies  by the american publisher (the english edition that came out in 1984 being called the 2024 report) 

in 2007 dad's last project sent me and about 20 young people to bangladesh over a 5 year period of interviews:: to understand the miracle if how poorest village girls were empowered to build a 100+ million nation out of nothing -the exponentially  sustainable systems story turns out not to be primarily muhammad yunus' but sir fazle abed's at brac; unfortunately no college in usa where i live actually teaches how sir fazle did it; even after george soros and gorbachev's 20th open society laureate to sir fazle in 2013 this greatest end poverty story of the manually networked www.brac.net and the digitally networked www.bkash.com isnt widely understood in colleges or schools - if it were the gap between education and livelihoods would have become so big

motivated by belief in sir fazle's goals, over the last decade my family's friends and I have become crazy about researching two stories- those of a handful of world record job creators like sir fazle abed and jack ma; what youth (the half of the world under 30) say they need at very practical levels - for example there is a huge demand among worldwide youth but most of all among girls and chinese youth for english as a second language to be 10 times more affordable/accessible to action learn- in brexit world, this could be britain's greatest trading opportunity; it wont happen fast enough through classical schools and their unions; it could happen if british council celebrated every way that youth could be encouraged to peer to peer learn and teach english- since that was jack ma's life to age of 29 it shouldnt be that difficult to ask for  his partnership with british council and with friends of gordon browns Home | the Education Commission to which jack has already testified half of youth will be unemployable by 2030 unless we celebrate experiments in transforming education beyond classrooms and beyond standardised exams on old siloised theoretical subjects

i always like to clarify where an idea was sourced - the value of english as a second language is something 4 young female chinese graduates have brainstormed with me for 2 years now and accidentally this led me to one of dad's 1976 stories in The Economist; that we could encourage 1.3  billion underemployed people to come out from behind their wall ; and learn from how they designed digital media leapfroging uninhibited by the various ways that western mass media has spun many totally unnecessary disasters

whats worth following up now is that xi jinping's main job is to design valuable livelihoods fir half a billion youth , in a system where most parents main security net is the livelihood of one child per family- so now is the time for any country that wants to value its youth livelihoods to collaborate around the many sustainable solutions that xi jinping and jack ma launched at the china g20, and are using each g20's next location to identify best job creating partners; argentina 2018 and india g20 2019 are the two that interest me most because the franciscan models of development are best for girls empowerment and spreading families healthy peace-loving communities everywhere, and china and india have to celebrate every coding leapfrog they can - but most of India's youth solutions  will be win-win with developing any youth who have opportunity to join in either in english or chimese

my apologies if this was a long introduction ; in writing our future history in 1984 our core hypothesis was that really only 2 opposite outcomes would spin from 1000 times more communications technology- orwell had already clarified big brother non-sustainable end game of humanity; I believe brexit britain can make huge contributions to celebrating little sister economics and diversity of societies if we open space massive debates around sorts of ideas above

at the moment my favorite space to help do this in the west is west baltimore- back in 1881 4 black girls started what has become every case law intervention freeing black and female americans; pope frrancis recoginses this community as one of the outstanding paradigms for goal 11; i wonder where in the UK could become a sister city of baltimore as we try and linkin 100 mayors of supercities (designed to girls and francsican valuation ) around the world  

thank you for your consideration, chris macrae washington dc 240 316 8157 
projects of norman macrae foundation include
The Games of World Record Job Creation 





QuarterBillionGirls.com - a Norman Macrae Foundation Youth Economists Project




Home | the Education Commission

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)