To understand why Mr Trump's 1461 day presidency to end of 2020 was likely to be the most dangerous whomever ruled the wavelengths, BRI.school invites you to co-edit a 7 minute read on a short history of world trade in millennium 2 - see far right column. In Moore's laws maths -this period's exponential rise breaches singularity - for first one computer chip has more switching/analytic capacity than the human brain's cells- tenmoore.com - The Games

  1. trump's 1461 days were natures, AI, SDG destiny's and most dangerous presidency this month's 3 greatest risks to under 30s goodwill webs and english-language edu- brexit, n korea and huawei (see keynesian analysis in next tweet)

INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4 : special china thanks: BRI Belt Road IQ -need custom guide rsvp chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk normanmacrae foundation, DC-text 240 316 8157
Main reason for optimism is leapfrogging - thats when a society/place that was excluded from industrial age networks leapfrogs an old system to a new one thanks to 1000 times more COMstech than 1946; about a third of the world never had wired telephone lines, now almost all have mobile (text version); more than a quarter of the world never had electricity grids, now microsolar is linking in;. Prior to 2017 only Jim Kim open spaced this debated in DC: let's hope all parents and youth do now from usa to china to Rome, from Scotland to Argentina, from Bangalore to Haiti. from . G1 G2. Join Valuetrue.com and QBG -does your place have a JYK to celebrate global youth? futures of Liberty 1 & education 1
1:08 #2030now 3.19
0:39 0.31 1:40 1:02 1.21
...joy jk search 1........ co
Which is your top 100 jim kim video vote for end-poverty tedx wcg..Jim Kim2030nowjimkim2transcripts.doc2030nowjimkim.doc, where world demands women manage poverty why not development?
http://www.tedxwbg.com/ Sources for millennials Happy 2015 dialogues of pih on 1 Ebola 2 how to leverage technology to radically engage patients on health care; UN is 2015 year of all change to sustainability goals... support economistmooc.blogspot.com
Even as the 1960s moon race inspired the world, we need to understand how unequal the opporttunity to innovate had been - even in the 1960s as many as half the world's people had no access to electricity grids so they got their news of the moon race by word of mouth.

Consider 1000-1500- until the last few years of this period , the known world was Europe-Asia and NE Africa; #BR8 the med sea was the main world trade waterway; places facing this sea increasingly developed win-win trades; moreover #BR7 the west asian border to med sea was the start of an amazing overland relay of traders which stretched all the way to china (the silk road was the greatest overland world trade route ever and to sustain its interfacing markets required positive cross-cultural bridging all along its route. Silks and spices from the Chinese end acted like a positive currency- there was much demand for them whose value naturally went up the further they were merchanted back to Europe. Everyone gained for this trading route- you can read marco polo's diaries- perhaps nowhere invested more in artistic celebrations of being a major hub of positive trade than his hometown venice in europe and the town he was asked to govern for 2 years in china Hangzhou which marco described as the great town of markets in the world.)

What happened towards 1500 that 2 long shipping routes were discovered by north europeans- the new world of the ameriucas to the west (#BR6 N, #BR10 what we now call Latin America), and a way of reaching the @BR2 South Asian coastal Belt (starting with the indian subcontinent) by sailing around africa. A ship captain couldnt affird such a long return voyage unless he goit what trade he wanted- soon this big ships were equipped with gun power and crews were pressganged or even enslaved. Next in the process was colonising. So it was that nations became big by pludering economies of other peoples places. Back in 1500 places economic size was corelated with population. Soon Britain grew at the expense particularly of the Indian subcontiuent. Mainly Britain and France colonised Africa too, Spain andPotrtugal colonised Latin America. North America was settled by a mixyure of Europeans whose declaration of Indendence in 1776 ended any attempt by Britain to colonise America, But we should note that the USA was built on a sort of internal colonisation - natives had theor places taken over and slaves were used to do most of the hard labour. In effect the old war's colonial ways casued the 2 world wars of the fkirst half of the 20th C. From 1946 most of the world's countries regained their independence but starting from (mainly undeveloped states - poverty that the colonia era had gtraped them in).

Ironically whule the UDA came to tghe resuce of the old workld and from 1946 helped relaunch the two biggest losers of world war 2 Germsny and Japan, american (not withstandiong thair family trees origins) had previously had little modern of knowledge of Eurasia but were pulled into peacekeeping and the cold war with russia through the sceond half of the 20th C. Whilst there was some understanding of the extraoerdinary progress japanese enginers made with electornics, civil and other enginnering, the rise and rise of the east and the often difficult bodrers that had been caused by British and Jpoanese colonisation of the region are not deeply studied by most Americans or their media. It should be the best news the world has ever seen that the fifth of the world in chjna tghat closed itself to the world for more than a centiry after Brfits has offered opium as a gtrading currency in 1860 is now as entrepreneurial as anywhere. With over half of tghe world's ;people facikng either the sout asia or east asia coastal belts, the opportunity the east is cfreating to win0pwin gtrade oin line with moore's ever increasing technology should make sustainable youth worlwdie the gfreatesty positive curency-invetsment the human race has ever mapped. But this is not how USA or the block of coungtriues ruled by the Euro have marketed transapfrently. Instead we are caught in the Keynsian crisis of economist not valuing the hippocratic oathes he had published as tghe final chapter of the ngeneral throy of employment money and interest. The 2020s are likely to make the system designs our tech spreads irreversible- will the end game be big brother extinction or little sister sustainability?

Saturday, July 15, 2017

all the best to you

=========================

SUBJECT
Freeing all peoples to maximize opportunities of life/livelihoods;
sustaining this across generations

While economists have built complex tools like currencies, and written up a lot of principles starting with adam smith 1748, we argue that 3 turning points in human progress should be open spaced first wherever students and especially girls learn economics- especially when graduates of big colleges first learn economics

1 Keynes lessons from 1930s
2 The Economist’s lessons from Moon Landing (quarter century after end of world war 2)
3 2008
1111111111111111111111111111
1 Keynes lessons are simplest –read last chapter of The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money .
If you know this chapter then you can assess whether nay teacher of economics is worth .listening to

Keynes demonstrates that increasingly only economist design system rules that determine what will be possible for a next generation out of places. He therefore concludes- economists are youth’s greatest enemy except where everything they deign has 2 overarching goals:
Better livelihood opportunities for next generation
End poverty (ie end there being places in world which if you are born into you have little chance of making most of life)

Keynes who tutored my father also knew (though it may not be in final chapter) that

Industrial Revolution 1 begun by steam engine had caused some people to progress 200 fold beyond subsistence but other not at all. Also by early 1900s it was clear to get bigger as an industrial nation you needed ever more carbon and iron and other resources- when your country ran out you took it from colonies if you were an empire, or you went to war if you were not a neighbor. In other words although industrial revolution explained huge leaps in human progress, we needed a post-industrial revolution, Actually Jack Ma- particularly his speeches world economic forum 2017 when he announced ali baba Olympics is very clear on all of this

 2222222222222222222222222
1969 landing on moon
No time could more clearly demonstrate uneven opportunity of IR1- part of world racing to moon, another third of humans still having no electricity grids
Additionally moon landing demonstrated that computing's communications technologies were to be an even greater revolution than industrial revolution- so in 1969 the question was will we now design systems to improve youth livelihoods across generation and end poverty

In 1969, it was evident parts of east were doing well:
Japan korea, superports like hong hong TaiwanSingapore (all led by chiense diaspora)
Father envisioned asian pacific century led by china and which the whole world’s youth could link in celebrating. After all china is one fifth of the world’s people- in 1969 almost all of those people were underemployed but changes (perhaps moon landing being final inspiration) were under way.

In 1969 it was evident that:
Tv mass media was destroying the west’s ability to celebrate local communities; also a frightening thing had happened to social markets like health- in Europe most governments had launched “free” national health services- while this is wonderful idea there was no testing the way anything needs to be to sustain a market; in america the opposite mistake was made- people would get health depending how much they could afford to pay. The other western disaster evident by 1969, countries like usa were spending an additional 20% of everything their people earned on arms – nominally to protect world from nuclear etc. In other words ion every way that usa had been the nation designed to free livelihoods up to 1930s it was spinning away from leading the industrial revolution humans need. Finally note moon landing (ie the success of satellite communications) meant that doubling of how much money and time people spend on communications technologies would continue every 7 years from 1946 to past 2016. That revolution is over 1000 times (2**10) more being spent on communications. That connectivity changes the economics of everything –father called it death of cost of distance; youth of early 21st would need to sustain happjness and livelihoods across borders not just inside nations walls


333333333333333333333
what happened in 2008 is all major western banks were bankrupted by subprime
its amazing how few economist have owned up to the mistake and changed their rules let alone their teaching
sadly in America and most of Europe (exception iceland- Michael moore movie) the same big banks have been refinanced with the same owners- youth pays for this particularly poorest youth whether this is inner city boys with guns in usa or girls and family builders in many other societies – in other words youth in western nations have been locked into ever less livelihood opportunities just as post industrial revolution co-creation opportunities could be wonderful- they can only get out of this problem if they learn economics (develop peer friendships) from the 2 extremely  innovative livelihood places since 1969 – china and Bangladesh; in addition blockchain was born in 2008; so was alipay and the opportunity that peoples digital currencies would take pack everything lost when west politicians printed paper currencies- to be absolutely clear in the west since world war 2 not only have economists been youth greatest enemy they have designed systems round bad big gets bigger and bipolar political quarrels over social needs but where television has hidden the big problem is find solutions with all this new innovation and by linking in brilliant coders of big data small- and clarifying what purpose of every markets serves future livelihoods and sustainability

not mentioned in above is systems are by definition measured by exponential consequences up sustainably or down towards collapse – nothing could be a less sustainable metric than only ruling a big organisation bu how much profit did it extract over last quarter; in 2000 metrics of unseen wealth were debated at brookings but then president bush banned such research (the maths is pretty simple except its use would end big banking as usual! something aiib will do if its project like 2500 governors of green big bang are linked in by youth searchers now)  – to this day trust and goodwill are not mentioned by western economists though they now explain over 90% of what futures a places is connecting

No comments:

Post a Comment