To understand why Mr Trump's 1461 day presidency to end of 2020 was likely to be the most dangerous whomever ruled the wavelengths, BRI.school invites you to co-edit a 7 minute read on a short history of world trade in millennium 2 - see far right column. In Moore's laws maths -this period's exponential rise breaches singularity - for first one computer chip has more switching/analytic capacity than the human brain's cells- tenmoore.com - The Games

  1. trump's 1461 days were natures, AI, SDG destiny's and most dangerous presidency this month's 3 greatest risks to under 30s goodwill webs and english-language edu- brexit, n korea and huawei (see keynesian analysis in next tweet)

INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4 : special china thanks: BRI Belt Road IQ -need custom guide rsvp chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk normanmacrae foundation, DC-text 240 316 8157
Main reason for optimism is leapfrogging - thats when a society/place that was excluded from industrial age networks leapfrogs an old system to a new one thanks to 1000 times more COMstech than 1946; about a third of the world never had wired telephone lines, now almost all have mobile (text version); more than a quarter of the world never had electricity grids, now microsolar is linking in;. Prior to 2017 only Jim Kim open spaced this debated in DC: let's hope all parents and youth do now from usa to china to Rome, from Scotland to Argentina, from Bangalore to Haiti. from . G1 G2. Join Valuetrue.com and QBG -does your place have a JYK to celebrate global youth? futures of Liberty 1 & education 1
1:08 #2030now 3.19
0:39 0.31 1:40 1:02 1.21
...joy jk search 1........ co
Which is your top 100 jim kim video vote for end-poverty tedx wcg..Jim Kim2030nowjimkim2transcripts.doc2030nowjimkim.doc, where world demands women manage poverty why not development?
http://www.tedxwbg.com/ Sources for millennials Happy 2015 dialogues of pih on 1 Ebola 2 how to leverage technology to radically engage patients on health care; UN is 2015 year of all change to sustainability goals... support economistmooc.blogspot.com
Even as the 1960s moon race inspired the world, we need to understand how unequal the opporttunity to innovate had been - even in the 1960s as many as half the world's people had no access to electricity grids so they got their news of the moon race by word of mouth.

Consider 1000-1500- until the last few years of this period , the known world was Europe-Asia and NE Africa; #BR8 the med sea was the main world trade waterway; places facing this sea increasingly developed win-win trades; moreover #BR7 the west asian border to med sea was the start of an amazing overland relay of traders which stretched all the way to china (the silk road was the greatest overland world trade route ever and to sustain its interfacing markets required positive cross-cultural bridging all along its route. Silks and spices from the Chinese end acted like a positive currency- there was much demand for them whose value naturally went up the further they were merchanted back to Europe. Everyone gained for this trading route- you can read marco polo's diaries- perhaps nowhere invested more in artistic celebrations of being a major hub of positive trade than his hometown venice in europe and the town he was asked to govern for 2 years in china Hangzhou which marco described as the great town of markets in the world.)

What happened towards 1500 that 2 long shipping routes were discovered by north europeans- the new world of the ameriucas to the west (#BR6 N, #BR10 what we now call Latin America), and a way of reaching the @BR2 South Asian coastal Belt (starting with the indian subcontinent) by sailing around africa. A ship captain couldnt affird such a long return voyage unless he goit what trade he wanted- soon this big ships were equipped with gun power and crews were pressganged or even enslaved. Next in the process was colonising. So it was that nations became big by pludering economies of other peoples places. Back in 1500 places economic size was corelated with population. Soon Britain grew at the expense particularly of the Indian subcontiuent. Mainly Britain and France colonised Africa too, Spain andPotrtugal colonised Latin America. North America was settled by a mixyure of Europeans whose declaration of Indendence in 1776 ended any attempt by Britain to colonise America, But we should note that the USA was built on a sort of internal colonisation - natives had theor places taken over and slaves were used to do most of the hard labour. In effect the old war's colonial ways casued the 2 world wars of the fkirst half of the 20th C. From 1946 most of the world's countries regained their independence but starting from (mainly undeveloped states - poverty that the colonia era had gtraped them in).

Ironically whule the UDA came to tghe resuce of the old workld and from 1946 helped relaunch the two biggest losers of world war 2 Germsny and Japan, american (not withstandiong thair family trees origins) had previously had little modern of knowledge of Eurasia but were pulled into peacekeeping and the cold war with russia through the sceond half of the 20th C. Whilst there was some understanding of the extraoerdinary progress japanese enginers made with electornics, civil and other enginnering, the rise and rise of the east and the often difficult bodrers that had been caused by British and Jpoanese colonisation of the region are not deeply studied by most Americans or their media. It should be the best news the world has ever seen that the fifth of the world in chjna tghat closed itself to the world for more than a centiry after Brfits has offered opium as a gtrading currency in 1860 is now as entrepreneurial as anywhere. With over half of tghe world's ;people facikng either the sout asia or east asia coastal belts, the opportunity the east is cfreating to win0pwin gtrade oin line with moore's ever increasing technology should make sustainable youth worlwdie the gfreatesty positive curency-invetsment the human race has ever mapped. But this is not how USA or the block of coungtriues ruled by the Euro have marketed transapfrently. Instead we are caught in the Keynsian crisis of economist not valuing the hippocratic oathes he had published as tghe final chapter of the ngeneral throy of employment money and interest. The 2020s are likely to make the system designs our tech spreads irreversible- will the end game be big brother extinction or little sister sustainability?

Friday, October 20, 2017

Dear Jack and friends, In my view The Economist has made its biggest ever mistake declaring xi jinping depends on repression- its absolutely the opposite logic of my father's 1977 survey on celebrating China in the middle of millennials world




Jack i am wondering if you have time to summarise new zealand and australian view on issues like the following (that assumes they are of concern to all of us- please edit if some are and others not)
as first debated by my father we are now spending 1000 times more on tech of connectivity than 1946- what needs to be mediated so places stuck in 1946 politiccs and carbon energised constitutions can join in places already celebrating collaboration futures of youth and people-centric economies


when you look at livelihood creating drivers of post-industrial revolution such as
4 geographic economies belt road mapping of win-win world trade routes and peaceful cultural connections

3 racing to go green and acheive sustainable  humanity's happiest goals

2 going digital, with big data small enterprise platforms that include every community- leapfrog models such as www.bkash.com in mp3 world, alipay in mp4 world and perhaps blockchain in mp5 world- also humanising AI


1 new development banking models starting with a cluster of the largest countries by population or geographic space- what are flagship projects that rich nations aid and banking has never demonstrated in replicable ways - for example asian infrastructire investment bank is an alumni network with various intriguing projects never banked before

eg launched at korea summit june 2017 -first annual gathering of 80 national delgations of aiib
indonesia ending slums
shanghai devloping a local area for most intense big computing eg blockchain mining entirely energised by solar
benchmarking club of 2000 place governors racing to carbon zero

next aiib summit mumbai june 2018
question will the world be treated to seeing some new projects representing the two nations that represent third of world's people development emerge

a month later argentina g20 has opportunity to relaunch greatest franscican economy project networks -this is the culture jim kim said he wanted to transform world bank deepest end poverty projects and last mile health around- its also the only proven culture empowering girls to build a poor nation


MEDIA/MEDIATION CRISIS
it would seem to me that there are places whose branding (all of its media) is linking together a total vision decision making from global village to supercity to state to nation to region are part of a benchmarking club that wants to go beyond the age of big get bigger driven by carbon use ,and those that have as yet no media nor place leadership constitution capable of these new win-win trades

as a genral rule of thumb leaders who get on with xi jinping and jack ma are taking partnering in sustainbility tipping points seriously; the rest of the world isnt

inconveniently the bigger english speaking nations (in which 80% of world knowledge is still conducted) are in the wrong group - there is perhaps a new opportunity for new zealand, australia, canada, malaysia singapore to lead at least some sectors such as health care and education in ways that brexit UK and trump usa isnt even beginning to map

do you or other friends of media can do good (and the missing audit of trutst-flows which causes most of the western world's biggest organsiations to be the least expoentially sustainable) see the next few years this way and if so are there any ideas on what we can do about it; we have various chinese coinnections established in large parts due to some ourtanding chinese students- there is an urgent calendar of where these place debates will win or lose under 30s as the sustainability generation ( a ridiculoius mistake for media experts to sit by and let happen)

chris  washington dc 240 316 8157
www.economistchina.net www.economistasean.com www.economistjapan.com www.economistamerica.com www.economisteurope.com and 15 more spaces on what futures are we compounding including 
www.chinacybercenter.com -how do we change technology being 90% conceived round male's egos
www.erworld.tv  first 50 years of entreprenurial revolution started at The Economist 
www.damocity.net place partnes in the new 15 billion dollar colege of industrial revolution 4

===============================previously

On Friday, 20 October 2017, 02:55:43 GMT-4, Ian Ryder <ian.ryder@gmail.com> wrote:


Hi Chris,

Sadly Medinge has changed shape completely from our original philanthropic group of brand experts trying to do some good in the world....
More than half of the sustainable world's value depends on youth partnerships inspired by china's brainstorming with other 100 national leaders - see belt road

dear under 30s 
you are half of the world - if you want to be the sustainability generation please linkin with chinese youth or big data small tech businesses (see world record job creator number 2 jack ma) or worldwide place partners (see world record job creator number 1 xi jinping)
dear under 30s girls - you are at least 1/4 of the world's sustainable productivity but macroeconomists and western tv of the industrial revolution treated you as less than 1/20th please make friendships with chinese girls wherever women are empowered to lift up half the sky -see also world record job creators sir fazle abed and jim kim
dear under 30s poor girls -  you are at least 1/8 of sustainability generation- please demand united bangladesh india  myanmar and chinese girls empowerment solutions and make sure that world record job creators pope francis, nilekani. modi know of all your best efforrts before july 2018 argentina g20 and PM modi. tech billinniare nilekani know before june 2018 aiib mumbai

BrandChartering.Com - How to do no evil with brand superpower: Do Nows value multply Unique Purpose

No comments:

Post a Comment