To understand why Mr Trump's 1461 day presidency to end of 2020 was likely to be the most dangerous whomever ruled the wavelengths, BRI.school invites you to co-edit a 7 minute read on a short history of world trade in millennium 2 - see far right column. In Moore's laws maths -this period's exponential rise breaches singularity - for first one computer chip has more switching/analytic capacity than the human brain's cells- tenmoore.com - The Games

  1. trump's 1461 days were natures, AI, SDG destiny's and most dangerous presidency this month's 3 greatest risks to under 30s goodwill webs and english-language edu- brexit, n korea and huawei (see keynesian analysis in next tweet)

INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4 : special china thanks: BRI Belt Road IQ -need custom guide rsvp chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk normanmacrae foundation, DC-text 240 316 8157
Main reason for optimism is leapfrogging - thats when a society/place that was excluded from industrial age networks leapfrogs an old system to a new one thanks to 1000 times more COMstech than 1946; about a third of the world never had wired telephone lines, now almost all have mobile (text version); more than a quarter of the world never had electricity grids, now microsolar is linking in;. Prior to 2017 only Jim Kim open spaced this debated in DC: let's hope all parents and youth do now from usa to china to Rome, from Scotland to Argentina, from Bangalore to Haiti. from . G1 G2. Join Valuetrue.com and QBG -does your place have a JYK to celebrate global youth? futures of Liberty 1 & education 1
1:08 #2030now 3.19
0:39 0.31 1:40 1:02 1.21
...joy jk search 1........ co
Which is your top 100 jim kim video vote for end-poverty tedx wcg..Jim Kim2030nowjimkim2transcripts.doc2030nowjimkim.doc, where world demands women manage poverty why not development?
http://www.tedxwbg.com/ Sources for millennials Happy 2015 dialogues of pih on 1 Ebola 2 how to leverage technology to radically engage patients on health care; UN is 2015 year of all change to sustainability goals... support economistmooc.blogspot.com
Even as the 1960s moon race inspired the world, we need to understand how unequal the opporttunity to innovate had been - even in the 1960s as many as half the world's people had no access to electricity grids so they got their news of the moon race by word of mouth.

Consider 1000-1500- until the last few years of this period , the known world was Europe-Asia and NE Africa; #BR8 the med sea was the main world trade waterway; places facing this sea increasingly developed win-win trades; moreover #BR7 the west asian border to med sea was the start of an amazing overland relay of traders which stretched all the way to china (the silk road was the greatest overland world trade route ever and to sustain its interfacing markets required positive cross-cultural bridging all along its route. Silks and spices from the Chinese end acted like a positive currency- there was much demand for them whose value naturally went up the further they were merchanted back to Europe. Everyone gained for this trading route- you can read marco polo's diaries- perhaps nowhere invested more in artistic celebrations of being a major hub of positive trade than his hometown venice in europe and the town he was asked to govern for 2 years in china Hangzhou which marco described as the great town of markets in the world.)

What happened towards 1500 that 2 long shipping routes were discovered by north europeans- the new world of the ameriucas to the west (#BR6 N, #BR10 what we now call Latin America), and a way of reaching the @BR2 South Asian coastal Belt (starting with the indian subcontinent) by sailing around africa. A ship captain couldnt affird such a long return voyage unless he goit what trade he wanted- soon this big ships were equipped with gun power and crews were pressganged or even enslaved. Next in the process was colonising. So it was that nations became big by pludering economies of other peoples places. Back in 1500 places economic size was corelated with population. Soon Britain grew at the expense particularly of the Indian subcontiuent. Mainly Britain and France colonised Africa too, Spain andPotrtugal colonised Latin America. North America was settled by a mixyure of Europeans whose declaration of Indendence in 1776 ended any attempt by Britain to colonise America, But we should note that the USA was built on a sort of internal colonisation - natives had theor places taken over and slaves were used to do most of the hard labour. In effect the old war's colonial ways casued the 2 world wars of the fkirst half of the 20th C. From 1946 most of the world's countries regained their independence but starting from (mainly undeveloped states - poverty that the colonia era had gtraped them in).

Ironically whule the UDA came to tghe resuce of the old workld and from 1946 helped relaunch the two biggest losers of world war 2 Germsny and Japan, american (not withstandiong thair family trees origins) had previously had little modern of knowledge of Eurasia but were pulled into peacekeeping and the cold war with russia through the sceond half of the 20th C. Whilst there was some understanding of the extraoerdinary progress japanese enginers made with electornics, civil and other enginnering, the rise and rise of the east and the often difficult bodrers that had been caused by British and Jpoanese colonisation of the region are not deeply studied by most Americans or their media. It should be the best news the world has ever seen that the fifth of the world in chjna tghat closed itself to the world for more than a centiry after Brfits has offered opium as a gtrading currency in 1860 is now as entrepreneurial as anywhere. With over half of tghe world's ;people facikng either the sout asia or east asia coastal belts, the opportunity the east is cfreating to win0pwin gtrade oin line with moore's ever increasing technology should make sustainable youth worlwdie the gfreatesty positive curency-invetsment the human race has ever mapped. But this is not how USA or the block of coungtriues ruled by the Euro have marketed transapfrently. Instead we are caught in the Keynsian crisis of economist not valuing the hippocratic oathes he had published as tghe final chapter of the ngeneral throy of employment money and interest. The 2020s are likely to make the system designs our tech spreads irreversible- will the end game be big brother extinction or little sister sustainability?

Saturday, February 1, 2020

delighted to know if there is another plan z

guterres pulled strategy components of  report on same issue his digitalcooperation panel with melinda gates and jack ma and itu geneva was due to report april 2019 due to not wanting to battle trump


ditto he has been sitting on report of top 5 financial people (blackrock  blackstone  schwab...)  of 300 trillion dollars western pension money not accepting any sdg investment nor and asian infrastructore invetsment as asset grade


something has to give some time before november coo26 glasgow imo

chris

----- Forwarded message -----
From: Bloomberg New Economy <noreply@mail.bloombergbusiness.com>
To: "chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk" <chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, 1 February 2020, 07:02:07 GMT-5
Subject: America is all alone

Bloomberg   
The more Boris Johnson’s government wavered over allowing Huawei into Britain’s 5G networks, the louder the warnings from Washington became. 
“Can you imagine Reagan and Thatcher having a conversation in the 1980s saying, ‘Let’s have the KGB build our telecommunications systems, because they’re giving us a great discount?’” asked Matt Pottinger, the U.S. National Security Council official responsible for China. Britain went with Huawei anyway, a decision that may go down as a turning point in history.
If we are in the foothills of a new Cold War, as Henry Kissinger asserted at last year’s New Economy Forum, the balance of forces looks nothing like the last one. The possible outcomes are highly uncertain, too.

This week in the New Economy

Boris Johnson.
The actual Cold War—the one from which Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher emerged victorious—divided the world into two hostile camps. In Europe, NATO and Warsaw Pact tanks squared off against each other across barbed wire frontiers. But even then, Washington found it hard to limit the flow of technology. 
Three decades later, global value chains are making nonsense of Trump administration efforts to force countries to choose. Consider the fact that Ericsson—the safe option, for those who see Huawei’s gear as a security risk—sources parts for its own 5G equipment from China
Britain knows Huawei better than almost any other Western country. U.K. cybersecurity experts have torn apart the company’s software, discovering serious bugs but no hard evidence of malicious intent. And its regulators have devised sophisticated safeguards against possible espionage or sabotage. Britain also plans to mitigate any risk by excluding Huawei from the core of its 5G networks and capping its market share at 35%.
Some interpret Johnson’s decision to rebuff Washington as pragmatism. From this perspective, he’s provided a sensible template for countries who share America’s distrust of Huawei but can’t resist its low prices and high quality products. It’s quite likely much of the rest of the world will copy Britain’s cautious embrace of China’s flagship tech company.
The break goes much further than that, however. By ignoring repeated warnings to exclude Huawei, the British prime minister sent a bigger message to President Donald Trump: Nobody will join a Cold War against Beijing, not even Washington’s closest ally. 
This is one of those moments that underscores how global power is shifting in Beijing’s favor—not decisively, but in ways that shape the critical choices of governments, even when those decisions could compromise their long-term national security. 
Johnson’s decision may come with a price, though. Not only has he jolted the “special relationship,” but his gambit raises questions about the U.K.’s future as part of the “ Five Eyes” anglophone intelligence alliance. Moreover, he may have jeopardized the jumbo-sized U.S. trade deal he desperately needs now that Britain is pulling out of the European Union.
Still, no country can afford to have China as an enemy, a fact that makes Reagan-Thatcher era analogies fall flat. Johnson’s momentous choice reveals the limits of Washington’s efforts to contain an adversary by choking off its access to technology and going after its tech champions. It simply can’t build the necessary coalition: This Cold War is winding down even before it’s properly begun, and America seems to be all alone.

China’s $2 trillion check

Here’s another obstacle to America’s efforts to thwart China’s rise as a technology superpower: Beijing’s almost bottomless funding for science and the pool of ostensibly willing collaborators in the U.S. eager for cash.
The arrest of a prominent Harvard University scientist this week for allegedly lying to the FBI about receiving more than $2 mil­lion of Chinese money “un­der­scored how se­ri­ous Bei­jing is about at­tract­ing top tal­ent,” The Wall Street Journal said. The newspaper reported that, a decade ago, the Chi­nese gov­ernment pledged to spend what would amount to more than $2 tril­lion in today's dollars to re­verse a long­stand­ing brain-drain.

Wash your hands

The journalist and physician Elisabeth Rosenthal covered the SARS epidemic for the New York Times while living in China with her family in 2002 and 2003, so she’s well placed to offer advice on how to handle the coronavirus sweeping the country.
She keeps it simple: wash your hands. Also, masks don’t work very well. Keep this in mind over the next several weeks when we can expect growing panic as the numbers of those infected grow. And for those of you in America, remember that the flu, and not the coronavirus, has already killed 10,000 people this season.
_____________________________________________________

Like Turning Points? Subscribe to Bloomberg All Access and get much, much more. You’ll receive our unmatched global news coverage and two in-depth daily newsletters, The Bloomberg Open and The Bloomberg Close.
Diversity is a business issue. Sign up now for our weekly Bloomberg Equality newsletter to get the latest on how companies and institutions are confronting issues of gender, race and class.
Download the Bloomberg app: It’s available for iOS and Android.
Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. Learn more.
FOLLOW US  GET THE NEWSLETTER
You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Turning Points newsletter.
Unsubscribe | Bloomberg.com | Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P. 731 Lexington, New York, NY, 10022

No comments:

Post a Comment